CaliforniaSchoolsCharlotte Wood Middle

Charlotte Wood Middle

PublicRegular
Danville, California · San Ramon Valley Unified
Teachers35.0FTE
Ratio25.3:1students per teacher
Students886enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students886
Grade Span6–8
Student:Teacher25.3:1
Free/Reduced Lunch5%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
23.1:1
8.7%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
37
5.7%vs prior yr
Enrollment
853
3.7%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:458
7.0%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:3,664
25.6%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:916
7.0%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
1:8,327
57.7%vs prior yrSSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.6:116.9:119.2:121.5:123.8:126.1:12020202120222023202423.5:123.6:123.7:125.3:123.1:1Charlotte Wood MiddleUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

848863878894909924353637373839202020212022202320249169198788868533939373537EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment916919878886853
Teacher FTE3939373537
Pupil : Teacher ratio23.5:123.6:123.7:125.3:123.1:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:4,2551:8,5101:12,7661:17,0211:21,2762015201720201:5381:4931:4581:19,7001:8,327Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:1,0641:2,1281:3,1911:4,2551:5,3192015201720201:2,4631:4,9251:3,6641:1,6421:9851:916Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)1.822
Nurses (FTE)0.40.20.3
Psychologists (FTE)0.611
Social Workers (FTE)00.10.1
Counselor : Pupils1:5381:4931:4581:250
Nurse : Pupils1:2,4631:4,9251:3,6641:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:1,6421:9851:9161:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:19,7001:8,3271:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.